Role of Pre-therapeutic 18F-FDG PET/CT in Guiding the Treatment Strategy and Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to evaluate the role of pre-therapeutic (18)fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET-CT) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in guiding the treatment strategy and predicting the prognosis of esophageal carcinoma, using the survival data of the patients. METHODS The present retrospective, cohort study was performed on 40 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma (confirmed by endoscopic biopsy), who underwent pre-operative (18)F-FDG PET-CT staging between January 2009 and June 2014. All the patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT and non-contrasted (18)F-FDG PET-CT evaluations. The patients were followed-up over 12 months to assess the changes in therapeutic strategies. Survival analysis was done considering the primary tumor SUVmax, using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. RESULTS In a total of 40 patients, (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan led to changes in disease stage in 26 (65.0%) cases, with upstaging and downstaging reported in 10 (25.0%) and 16 (40.0%) patients, respectively. The management strategy changed from palliative to curative in 10 out of 24 patients and from curative to palliative in 7 out of 16 cases. Based on the (18)F-FDG PET-CT scan alone, the median survival of patients in the palliative group was 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-5.0) months, whereas the median survival in the curative group has not been reached, based on the 12-month follow-up. Selection of treatment strategy on the basis of (18)F-FDG PET/CT alone was significantly associated with the survival outcomes at nine months (P=0.03) and marginally significant at 12 months (P=0.03). On the basis of SUVmax, the relation between survival and SUVmax was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan had a significant impact on stage stratification and subsequently, selection of a stage-specific treatment approach and the overall survival outcome in patients with esophageal carcinoma. However, pre-treatment SUVmax failed to stablish its usefulness in the assessment of patient prognosis and survival outcome.